Harry Potter

Harry Potter was the first book i really read the whole way through I was about 9 when i read it and up untill then i had hated reading. If it wasn't for the Harry Potter book's then I would'nt know half the things I know today.

Anyway back to the Book, I absolutly loved the first three Harry Potter books and read them all in super fast time but when I got to The Goblet Of Fire I was begining to get bored of the ongoing Voldermort and Harry battle. And untill recently that was the only one I had got up to. But I've just got to say that Harry Potter and the deathley hallows really was Amazing book, If anyone decides to read after this message then I know that the first few chapters are just setting the scene really but carry on reading it is worth it!

Ben Smith

I personally havent got round to reading the harry potter books but there in my list of ones i want to read. Has anyone read an Ian rankin? theyre crime books with the charecter of inspecter Rebus one which is a very strong charecter who is a ladys man who has a resemberlance to james bond.

Harry Potter is awesome.
Ask anyone who knew me in year 5/6 and they'll tell you I was obsessed.
And proff. Snape... he was brilliant.
I've read all of the books, (including the spin offs) seen all ofc the movies (so far) and was completely obsessed, which is ironic because the first time i saw it I hated it!

yeh, i always wanted to go to hogwarts and have magic, plus have my life narated by j.k rowling. she wrights the best!

She's not the best writer but her books are very good.
And yes, I would love to go to Hogwarts.

who do you belive to be the best writer?
some one once said JDP was the best celist ever, another person said 'she can't be the best ever'.
but who then? somebody has to be, and i vote her.
but i suposde it depends what you define 'good' as.

Exactly.
In literature it could be,
most entertaining,
most scary,
most thought provoking,
most emotion inspiring,
best written...
And these all deped on the audience and the opinion of the reader,
and even if I was going to to go through each catagory I would not be able to tell you just one for each.

And while we are on ther subject, why are we here and what is the meaning of life (42!).
*Laughs*

and with music i could be,
most enthusiastic
able to play the hardest peices
able to play with most feeling,
owning the best instument.

(and oneday, i will be all of those things *laughs*)

*Grins*

And I'll try to be what I said about literature.

we will not but try, we shall acomplish!

Indeed we shall comrade.
And our insanity shall distinguish our art!

(Most good artists seem to be insane.)

art is insanety let free from the mind.

A fabulous phrase.

Conformining is merely setting pointless boundrys.

(ooh! philosophical phrase battle!)

and pointess boundrys are sentencing your inocent self to prison

*Claps hands*

Reducing your entire soul to the prisoner who trundles through the motions unable to express the self, only to trudge and to repeat.

repatitioion in art is bourne from the teaching of tequnice. teqnice is fitted diferently to every one, clones never make it big.

Clones being identical and identical art equates to copyright infringment.

and a cloned peice of music, written by the same composer, when given to two seporate musicians, become more differant than imaginable.